Wednesday, April 1, 2020

Our different reactions to staying home

When it comes to explaining our reactions to usual situations, let alone unprecedentedly extreme crisis ones, there are many factors that came into play: personality, education, cognitive distortions, anxiety levels, financial income, physical and mental illness, cultural norms and much, much more. But the natural diversity of our behaviors, which otherwise would not cry out so loud, becomes particularly evident in the narrow labyrinth we have to take to get out of a crises.    
Personality wise my guess is that introverts were these who really celebrated the CORONA stay-home-in-isolation time. When they first heard about it they couldn’t believe the good news. A long time without the hectic and annoying disruptions of social interferences was always their dream. So they went to the supermarket, bought themselves a bottle of champagne and went home with no hesitation. With an unimaginable pleasure shut the door behind them and enjoyed the splendor of their solitude in their brand new home-office. However, for the Italian and Spanish stay-in-the-plaza-all-day-long temperament, who can’t even conceive having less than 78 different social interactions per day, the CORONA isolation was the bleakest nightmare. They stayed home only when they had both legs broken and immobilized, but their inability to move was 126% compensated by having all their friends and acquaintances over for coffee, branch, lunch, dinner and a late movie. They simply can’t be contained by the prison of their apartment for more than 4.5 hours at a time without going crazy, and smashing all the crystal, and lament to everyone how incredibly unfair this restriction is. They simply don’t care about any CORONA threat; they have to get out meeting their friends, walking the dog and enjoying the weekend barbecue!
At the other extreme we have the overanxious group, those who – even before CORONA - met agoraphobia in a public place, or used to check all possible sources of health information, or exhausted impressive amounts of hand cream to compensate for their frequent hand washing. Their outward behavior tends to be quite compliant when it comes to health policies, as they do not expose themselves out of inattention and never forget to implement even the least important of health rules. But such “perfect behaviors” are certainly fueled by their heavy anxiety drinking. Members of this group are not having just a coffee-cup of anxiety every morning; they are getting into their system 6 mugs full of strongly made anxiety drink every day, plus a rich model of worry cream decorations on the top of each mug (no exceptions!). Therefore these guys, while a piece of cake for authorities to manage, oftentimes need the special attention of mental-health professionals and have a terrific potential to stimulate their creativity in order to reduce their anxiety overdosing and bulimic worry cream intake.        
Another group that waved at us hoping to get some attention, if not the valueless coins we generally forget about, consists of those who barely make it for the day, the poor, the unemployed, the no money to buy the next bread type. We got a glimpse of the struggles endured by such Parasite by spying upon their world through the lens of Bong Joon-ho, the well-known Korean film maker. They would get out to perfect a lousy deal even in times of war, when real bombs would fall like heavy rain drops over the city. CORONA is no more threatening than the constant fears they forcefully befriended, and such a draconic tolerance left them vulnerable on many fronts. And all countries host their homeless bands on the last rung of their economic ladder. If you’d care just for a moment to see life from their perspectives, you’d get how absurd it sounds in their ears our stay home insistence.
But economic motives can highlight not only the behaviors of individuals, but also of whole regions and countries. In Europe at least, Greece thought herself lucky to have surpass its economic crises. And many of Aristotle’s descendants turned to sound business and were enthusiastic about their profit when CORONA signed up for a long tourist stay in Crete and Corfu and for a short visit to the Athens Archeological Museum. In this context, do you think that the Greek dump-the-economy-to-save-lives regulations were as easily released as the German ones? I bet they weren’t!
Sometimes difficult economic situations mingle with cultural norms and personality to form quite an explosive cocktail. Brazilian favelas and Romanian Gypsy communities are just two of the many examples where the utopia of social distancing and personal hygiene hit a peak. In these communities staying home in isolation is the most absurd of the absurd absurdities our society ever conceived. Beyond the precarious soap habits, their degree of social interconnectedness is so ingrained in their culture that CORONA couldn’t be happier. They have always seen kids running around eager to intimately know all the corners of all the houses of the entire neighborhood. And teenagers, adults and older people always mingled together in a no-personal-space manner animated by sharing the latest news, by hoping for a good business or a free meal. Such a tenacious community culture is the only life they know and want to know until their last day. What could ever convince them to just stay home?
Since we have reached this point, I’d like to take a moment for a bird-eye view reflection. In real life personality meets anxiety, and physical health, and mental health, and economy, and culture and another myriad of factors forming sometimes bizarre interconnections. I took the chance to highlight them one by one because I didn’t want to spoil your pleasure of saying “Right, I know someone like this!” But the complicated reality is that all such factors intermingle in a convoluted Chinese noodle soup style across our planet. Now let us go back to last examples we might have otherwise missed.
When it comes to the stay-in-isolation-for-a-long-time challenge, certain people had a long and harsh practice, tougher than the toughest SWAT practice. At least two limited mobility groups already graduated from this difficult master level class, although they were animated by totally, and I mean TOTALLY different motivations. I know, you probably don’t see very often in the same class physically impaired and convicted law-breaker students, but those were the two groups I was talking about. For them the CORONA stay home regulation is not news and didn’t change a bit their routine. They know how hard one has to study for graduation and are not surprised by the toll that has to be paid. I can just imagine the undetained satisfaction which lighted the face of a physically impaired girl in Argentina when she realized that now the whole world does not have to use “just empathy” to get how difficult it is to stay-home-all-day-for-two-months-in-a-row. And probably a similar comfort visited some law-breakers [1] who at lunch time started to exchange jokes like: “What’s the difference between being in and out of jail? None!
Anyhow, by far the funniest groups of all are the skeptics and minimizers, those who – despite the huge media coverage and the WHO roars about the imminent dangers – nonchalantly declare that they “don’t believe in this CORONA virus” or they cite Shakespeare and his “Much Ado about Nothing” play. And almost immediately through a comment about how unnecessary panicky the world is, or fake news or the hidden economic and political motivations they suspect lay behind all these schemes. For them seeing is believing, and since they were neither personally introduced to the CORONA nor haven’t seen her crown in a public place, continue to stay in the nonbeliever group. How could people be so crazy or naïve to believe that something invisible could actually be dangerous – they wonder out loud. Didn’t the common flue claim lives in the past and we all minded our business?
But finally we have render Caesar’s his belongings, and acknowledge for the satisfaction of extroverts, skeptics and low income favela residents that staying home is an excessive and unnatural behavior, mostly associated with significant costs. So yes, you are rightfully entitled to be irritated, frustrated, and stressed out. But if you have a better solution just CRY IT OUT LOUD so that everyone would hear how smart you are. And if you don’t, try your best to comply if you still want to hug your grandma next Easter. Unfortunately, during this crisis situation skeptics, minimizers, extroverts and favela residents are the perfect carriers because their anxiety and worry have betrayed them or they have run out of money for their third item on the list which was soap. And probably their only cure - for skeptics and minimizers I mean, as extroversion is definitely incurable and inheriting the grandpa’s favela was not an option - would be to get sick, and shut up, and go home.


Note: If you happen to be a journalist and think that every now and then I could contribute to the success of your publication, be bold and came up with a good offer. However, bear in mind that I only write about topics I deeply care, so let me drive the roller-coaster.






[1] I am aware that both prisoners and prison administrations are facing significant challenges when it comes to following strict sanitary rules to prevent the widespread of COVID-19 in such environments. Such concerns are certainly justified as interventions to change the situation for the better are difficult to implement there.   

Share:

0 comments:

Post a Comment